Know the opponent before the CMC.

Denua groups your matters by opponent and reads the findings you already accepted into a structured behaviour profile - every tag cited back to the finding it came from.

One view per opponent

Matters, accepted findings and behaviour patterns grouped by counterparty.

Deterministic tagging

A transparent rule tagger, not a model opinion - the same findings always give the same profile.

Cited, not asserted

Each behaviour carries the findings, documents and confidence it was read from.

Calibrated by evidence

A pattern seen once, or only in uncertain findings, is labelled thin - never dressed up.

Honest coverage

Findings that match no category are counted and reported, so nothing pretends to be complete.

Litigation-aware

Settlement, disclosure, interlocutory, delay, expert, admissions, costs and witness conduct.

A first read of how they litigate.

Counterparty memory is valuable because your firm has many matters - Denua reads across them rather than making you remember.

Behaviour profile

Walk into the CMC knowing how they behave

Instead of asking three partners what this opponent is like, you open one profile: their litigation behaviours, drawn from findings your firm already accepted, each one shown with the finding, document and citation behind it.

Anticipate the tactic before it lands - delay, disclosure games, late admissions.
Every tag is verifiable, so it can be repeated to a client or a judge.

Counterparty · profile12 matters

Halliwell Group Ltd

Deterministic tagger

Late / partial disclosure

6 accepted findings · 4 matters

Consistent

Settles close to hearing

3 accepted findings · 3 matters

Consistent

Aggressive interlocutory

1 accepted finding · 1 matter

Thin

Behaviour read from

Finding 214 — “Disclosure was served 19 days late.” Bundle p.417

Confidence on source findingSourced · 0.94

Indicative first read — tags are keyword-level over findings a lawyer accepted.

Cross-matter

Five matters against them read as one file

Your firm's history with an opponent is usually scattered across matters, teams and years. Denua groups it by counterparty with accepted-finding counts, so institutional knowledge survives the people who built it.

New team members inherit the firm's history on day one.
No one re-learns an opponent your firm has already fought.

Matters grouped by opponentFirm-wide

Ashcroft v Halliwell Group

Commercial · closed 2024

14 accepted

Halliwell Group v Nord Ltd

Contract · live

9 accepted

Re Halliwell (costs)

Costs · closed 2023

6 accepted

Vance v Halliwell Group

Professional negligence · live

4 accepted

Matters

Accepted findings

Bounded by design

A fast first read you can safely rely on

The profile is deterministic pattern matching over findings a lawyer accepted - and it says so on the page. You get the speed of an AI summary without inheriting an opinion you cannot defend.

No model guesswork sitting inside a strategy call.
Gaps in coverage are reported, not quietly hidden.

CoverageHonest by default

Findings matched to a behaviour28 / 37

Unmatched, reported not hidden9

Delay tactics

Seen once · uncertain source

Thin

Witness conduct

No qualifying findings

Not shown

A pattern seen once is labelled thin — never dressed up as a trend.

Behaviour categories tracked

100%

Tags cited to a finding

Model opinions in the profile

Walk into the room already briefed.

Turn the findings you already accepted into a defensible read on the other side.

Book a walkthrough Contact us