Research, analyse, and draft in the time it used to take to find the right document. Every output tells you exactly what to act on — and exactly what needs your eye.
12 Mar 2024 — Defendant signed NDA. Agreement clause 4.2 confirms execution date.
~April 2024 — Negotiations stalled. No drafts exchanged for 18 days.
Unknown date — Alleged second meeting. [VERIFY]
Most legal AI gives you an answer and asks you to trust it. No indication of what it's sure about. No flag on what it guessed. No record of what it couldn't find. That's why partners won't let it near a real matter — and why most firm AI subscriptions sit unused.
Chat-based AI is genuinely powerful. It's also genuinely difficult to use well on a real matter — and the burden lands entirely on your fee earner.
You write the prompt. The output depends entirely on how well you asked.
You select a Skill. It already knows what to ask, how to structure it, and what good looks like.
Every fee earner gets a different output. Quality is personal, not institutional.
Every output follows the same tested structure — whether a partner or a paralegal runs it.
You don't know what it missed. There's no record of the gaps.
Every output ends with a Gaps section — a named list of what wasn't in the documents.
Partners won't sign off work they can't trace back to a source.
Every claim is sourced or flagged [VERIFY]. Partners review it the way they'd review a junior's draft.
Denua Skills are tested workflows — built by us, refined on real matters, locked into a consistent structure. Your team doesn't prompt. They review. That's a fundamentally different relationship with AI output.
THE FIRST OUTPUT IS
THE RIGHT OUTPUT.
— Built into every Skill by design
Other tools give you an answer. Denua gives you an answer, a confidence level for every line, and a list of what it couldn't find. Your fee earner reads it the way they'd read a junior's research — verifying, not blindly trusting.
"Directly from your documents. Citation linked. Page and paragraph."
Verify the citation. Then trust it.
"A reasonable conclusion from what's there. Probably right."
Worth a partner's eye before you rely on it.
"Not enough to be sure. Flagged [Verify]. Don't use it yet."
Don't use it without checking.
Entry 01 — No documentation of payment received.
● OPENSeven Skills at launch, with new ones added every few weeks — each engineered for one high-time-cost task your team does on every matter. No prompting. No iteration. Run it, read it, use it. Every output sourced, structured, and ready for partner review.
Dated, sourced timeline from your entire bundle. Gaps flagged.
Every document coded Relevant / Privileged / Not Relevant.
CPR-compliant first draft with authority and bundle references.
Court-ready statement from interview notes. Uncertain facts flagged.
Chronological clinical summary with page-level citations.
Structured appeal with evidence references and ground analysis.
Sourced memo grounded in your documents, not the internet.
New Skills added every few weeks, built around what firms actually ask for.
A 412-page disclosure bundle. Case chronology built in eleven minutes. Here's exactly what it produced — and what it flagged.
PDFs, Word docs, anything. Stored EU-only. Deleted after processing. Zero pipeline persistence. No data stored beyond what the matter requires.
Pick from seven structured workflows built around work your team already does. No conversational guesswork. No prompt engineering. Just: select and run.
Every claim sourced, inferred, or flagged [VERIFY]. Your fee earner reviews the output the way they'd review a junior's draft — verifying, not blindly trusting.
Because we don't. Three tiers, real numbers, no usage caps, no per-seat traps, no call-us-for-pricing. Legal teams value transparency. So do we.
Annual billing saves 20% and fits your firm's budget cycle. Most firms go annual.
Priced and scoped for litigation teams that don't have enterprise budgets — and shouldn't need them.
Competitor pricing from public sources, correct at time of publication.
Pre-signed DPA, completed SOC 2 lite, subprocessor list, and a public status page. Reviews in 3–5 weeks from procurement.
Every output shows you exactly what it sourced, what it inferred, and what it flagged as uncertain. You review it the way you'd review a junior's work — verifying, not blindly trusting. The model cannot invent a source that isn't in your bundle.
Case Chronology Builder on a 400-page bundle: 8–14 minutes. Document Relevance Coder on 200 documents: 20–35 minutes. First output is the right output — no iteration required.
Yes. You upload your own bundle. Denua only reads what you give it — it never searches the internet or references external databases.
Request it. We build new skills around what firms actually ask for, released every few weeks. Firm tier customers get custom skill creation included.
ChatGPT requires you to write the prompt, structure the output, and judge whether the result is any good — every time, differently. Denua Skills are pre-built workflows. You select, it runs, you review. Same structure every output. No prompt engineering.
Frankfurt datacentre. No data crosses EU borders. Under any circumstance.
Documents are processed in memory and deleted immediately. Nothing is cached. Nothing persists.
Data Processing Agreement available on request. Ready for your IT and compliance team in minutes, not weeks.
Denua never searches the internet. It only reads what you upload. The model cannot invent a case that isn't in your bundle.